Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑIMZ ÀÓÇöõÆ®ÀÇ Çöó½ºÆ½ ¹× ƼŸÀ± IMEÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A study on stress distribution in IMZ implant with a plastic or a titanium IME using finite element analysis

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 1993³â 31±Ç 4È£ p.625 ~ 642
ÇÏÁö¾ç, Ãֺκ´, ¿ìÀÌÇü,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÇÏÁö¾ç ( Ha Chi-Yang ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Ãֺκ´ ( Choi Boo-Byung ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¿ìÀÌÇü ( Woo Yi-Hyung ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Whether stress-absorbing elements are functional in an implant system has been an issue of interest in oral implantology.
@ES The results were as follows: @EN 1. Under the load 1, all the displacement of implant with titanium IME at 5 measuring points was larger than that of with POM IME except total and Y-axis displacement at implant apex. And the differences in stress distributions with POM and titanium were varied.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed